检索结果相关分组
- 玉茗堂和汤显祖墓
- 作者：晓旭 来源：江西历史文物 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 汤显祖 临川 《牡丹亭》 公元 玉茗堂四梦 《紫钗记》 明神宗 太常寺 剧坛 书香
- 描述： 汤显祖是明代杰出的戏 剧大师,他与莎士比亚恰似两颗明星在东西方剧坛上交相辉映。 汤显祖是江西临川人,1550年出生在一个世代书香的家庭里。他字义仍,又号海若、若士、清远道人等。明神宗万历年间考中进士,曾任南京太常寺博士、礼部主事。后来为揭发时弊,给皇帝上奏《论辅臣科臣
- 玉茗堂断记
- 作者：吴文丁 来源：江西教育 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 汤显祖 《临川四梦》 抚州 沙井 高韵 绝俗 戏曲家 剧坛 《牡丹亭》 故里
- 描述： 在我的家乡,有许多古代文化遗址,其中以“玉茗堂”最著名。我国明代大戏曲家汤显祖,生前最爱白瓣绿蕊、高韵绝俗的玉茗花(即白山茶)。他弃官回到故里——江西抚州后,用十年时间,借助亲朋的资助,建成一座
- 《玉茗堂批订董西厢》辨伪
- 作者：徐朔方 来源：社会科学战线 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 汤显祖 董西厢 遂昌 屠隆 十三年 袁宏道 霍小玉 辨伪 戏曲作品 署名
- 描述：,邑在万山中,人境僻绝。古厅无讼,衙退,疏帘,捉笔了霍小玉公案。时取参观,更觉会心。辄泚笔淋漓,快叫欲绝。何物
- 大雅堂在四川
- 作者：陈伯勋 来源：四川师范大学学报(社会科学版) 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 四川 黄庭坚 杜甫 江西诗派 王安石新法 《神宗实录》 诗歌革新 柔靡 杨亿 西昆体
- 描述： “不登大雅之堂”,这是人们长期以来常用的一个成语。北宋后期,江西诗派的领袖黄庭坚为苏门四学士之一。宋初诗坛承晚唐遗风,盛行杨亿、刘筠等人内容贫乏、浮艳柔靡的“西昆体”。黄庭坚力图继承欧阳修、苏轼等人反西昆诗风的诗歌革新工作,大力提倡学习杜甫。黄庭坚因修《神宗实录》诋斥王安石新法,於宋哲宗绍圣
- 玉海楼简介
- 作者：潘知山 来源：浙江学刊 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 玉海楼 县城 藏书楼 文物保护单位 孙衣言 浙江省 太平天国革命 占地面积 孙诒让 王应麟
- 描述：《玉海》一书,因用“玉海”以名斯楼,取其“为世宝贵而又无所不备”之意。
- 毛东堂行实考略
- 作者：周笃文 来源：文学评论 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 四库提要 行实 苏轼 蔡京 集卷 考索 苏东坡 墓志铭 分飞 曾布
- 描述：“初元祐中,苏轼守杭州,滂为法曹,秩满去,已行抵富阳。轼闻有歌其惜分飞词者,折简追还,留连数月,由此知名。然其后乃出蔡氏兄弟之门。《铁围山丛谈》载蔡京柄政时,滂上一词,甚伟丽,因骤得进用。王明清《挥麈后录》又载“滂为曾布所赏,
- 浅谈王应麟的《玉海》
- 作者：梁亦佳 来源：河南图书馆季刊 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述：识广闻,"自经史传注,诸子群书,以及于稗官小说,方技术纬之书,诵之如流,言之如掌。"王应麟在学术上还能兼取诸家,无门户之见。他治学"沈潜先儒
- 读陆游记梦诗-兼论梦与文学创作的关系
- 作者：吴长庚 来源：上饶师专学报(社会科学版) 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 记梦 陆游 无意识 曹雪芹 梦境 生活经验 汤显祖 文学创作 形象 象征
- 描述：为全书的总纲。鲁迅先生也是写梦的
- 「学案」体裁产生的思想背景：从李绂的「陆子学谱」谈起
- 作者：黄进兴 来源：汉学研究 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述： historiography. In this essay, I will try to clarify how Huang's work departs from the older, more traditional styles used by historical analysts. Specifically, the Ming-ju will be examined from the vantage of precendent-in particular, the degree to which it follows the modes of presentation employed by the "intellectual geneaologies" (hsueh-pu or, yuan-yuan lu) and, the extent to which it departs from tradition by transforming content rather than form. For many, the rise of the school of Wang Yang-ming during the sixteenth century signalled not only a revival of the teachings of Lu Hsiang-shan but also rekindled the intense debates of almost forgotten issues previously argued by those who adhered to the school of Chu Hsi and those who held to the theories of Lu Hsiang-shan. From the middle-Ming period onward, however, the conflicts generated by these two schools of thought began to extend well beyond the realm of academic argument. As both Chan Chien and Ku Yen-wu noted, their bickering began to influence such extra-intellectual areas as how the civil-service examinations should be organized. As these conflicts continued to broaden and to deepen, both schools felt impelled to strengthen their philosophical positions and to purify the accounts of their intellectual origins. As such, the construction of an "intellectual geneaology" became a major device used either to undermine the "legitimacy" of the learning of the opposition or to explain how the contending school had, indeed, inherited the transmission of the true Way. Since this sort of approach encouraged a strong sense of faction-spirit, it was only a question of time until it would be deemed biased. And, it was precisely because of the unevenness in evaluating issues exhibited by these compilations that Huang Tsung-hsi felt compelled to compose the "Philosophical Records"--a work at once noteworthy for its ability to bring impartiality and objectivity to historical analysis. Yet, if the "Philosophical Records" is juxtaposed against the "geneaologies" the difference between these two works tends to pale when one realizes that the compositional style employed by both is, essentially, the same. Here, the "Philosophical Records" can hardly be viewed as presenting one with a radical departure from precedent. Rather, Huang's work derives its import from the refreshing non-partisan approach it brings to the analysis of historical issues. Instead of writing intellectual history with a view toward proving various predetermined value-judgments, the "Philosophical Records" uses exposition to explore the multifarious realms that inform "historical reality" in all its variety and fullness.