-
「学案」体裁产生的思想背景:从李绂的「陆子学谱」谈起
-
作者:黄进兴 来源:汉学研究 年份:1984 文献类型 :期刊文章
-
描述: historiography. In this essay, I will try to clarify how Huang's work departs from the older, more traditional styles used by historical analysts. Specifically, the Ming-ju will be examined from the vantage of precendent-in particular, the degree to which it follows the modes of presentation employed by the "intellectual geneaologies" (hsueh-pu or, yuan-yuan lu) and, the extent to which it departs from tradition by transforming content rather than form.
For many, the rise of the school of Wang Yang-ming during the sixteenth century signalled not only a revival of the teachings of Lu Hsiang-shan but also rekindled the intense debates of almost forgotten issues previously argued by those who adhered to the school of Chu Hsi and those who held to the theories of Lu Hsiang-shan. From the middle-Ming period onward, however, the conflicts generated by these two schools of thought began to extend well beyond the realm of academic argument. As both Chan Chien and Ku Yen-wu noted, their bickering began to influence such extra-intellectual areas as how the civil-service examinations should be organized. As these conflicts continued to broaden and to deepen, both schools felt impelled to strengthen their philosophical positions and to purify the accounts of their intellectual origins. As such, the construction of an "intellectual geneaology" became a major device used either to undermine the "legitimacy" of the learning of the opposition or to explain how the contending school had, indeed, inherited the transmission of the true Way.
Since this sort of approach encouraged a strong sense of faction-spirit, it was only a question of time until it would be deemed biased. And, it was precisely because of the unevenness in evaluating issues exhibited by these compilations that Huang Tsung-hsi felt compelled to compose the "Philosophical Records"--a work at once noteworthy for its ability to bring impartiality and objectivity to historical analysis. Yet, if the "Philosophical Records" is juxtaposed against the "geneaologies" the difference between these two works tends to pale when one realizes that the compositional style employed by both is, essentially, the same. Here, the "Philosophical Records" can hardly be viewed as presenting one with a radical departure from precedent. Rather, Huang's work derives its import from the refreshing non-partisan approach it brings to the analysis of historical issues. Instead of writing intellectual history with a view toward proving various predetermined value-judgments, the "Philosophical Records" uses exposition to explore the multifarious realms that inform "historical reality" in all its variety and fullness.
-
李绂与《陆子学谱》
-
作者:杨朝亮 年份:2003 文献类型 :学位论文
-
描述:地留给了陆王后学。 在清代陆王学术的发展中,李绂是其关键人物之一。李绂一生致力于陆王学术,著有《陆子学谱》、《陆子年谱》、《朱子晚年全论》诸书,极力为陆学争正统。《陆子学谱》二十卷,用李绂
-
读《李绂与〈陆子学谱〉》
-
作者:李尚英 来源:中国社会科学院研究生院学报 年份:2006 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 朱子学 李绂 中国封建社会 历史时期 康乾盛世 理性思维 心学思想 继续发展 内在逻辑 统治者
-
描述:清代是中国封建社会中一个重要的历史时期,它不仅呈现出康乾盛世的繁荣,而且也在学术上做出了重要贡献。清初,统治者把朱子学确立为官方哲学,致使清前期陆王心学思想中理性思维的光辉逐渐黯淡无光。但陆王学术
-
杨朝亮著《李绂与〈陆子学谱〉》评介
-
作者:袁林 来源:中国史研究动态 年份:2006 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 评介 子学 李绂 学术特征 今文经学 内在张力 章太炎 梁启超 学术史
-
描述:陆王学的研究,就是一个亟需充实的薄弱环节。
-
李绂与陆王心学
-
作者:李帆 来源:清史研究 年份:2006 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 李绂 陆王心学 躬行实践 陆 王学统
-
描述:"陆、王学者第一重镇"。
-
《陆子学谱》初探
-
作者:杨朝亮 来源:聊城大学学报(社会科学版) 年份:2003 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 李绂 《陆子学谱》 陆王心学 内在逻辑
-
描述:争正统的任务便历史地留给了陆王后学———李绂。
-
李觏思想研究
-
作者:李 思想研究 来源:中国社会科学出版社 年份:1984 文献类型 :图书
-
描述:李觏思想研究
-
试论李绂方志学思想
-
作者:史五一 来源:广西地方志 年份:2010 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 李绂 李绂 清代 清代 方志学 方志学 修志之才 修志之才
-
描述:李绂既是修志的实干家,又是方志学理论家,其思想有其独到精辟之处。他提出了“方志乃是史类”、“以诸史为宗”、“籍征考”与“资援据”、“修志之才与修志之志”等观点,对我国传统方志学的建立与发展做出了很大
-
试论李绂的方志学思想
-
作者:史五一 来源:新疆地方志 年份:2010 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 李绂 李绂 清代 清代 方志学 方志学 修志之才 修志之才
-
描述:一席之地。
-
朱熹的《周礼》学思想
-
作者:殷慧 肖永明 来源:湖南大学学报(社会科学版) 年份:2008 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 朱熹 《周礼》 思想
-
描述:朱熹坚信《周礼》为周公所作,维护其作为礼学经典的神圣地位。这一态度既是对宋代《周礼》研究的反思与批驳,也与其为学宗旨有着密切的联系。从朱熹与王安石、陈傅良、胡宏在《周礼》观上的分歧,可以看到朱熹