检索结果相关分组
- 释“昔”“腊”
- 作者：何金松 来源：复印报刊资料(语言文字学) 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 说文 段玉裁 引申义 本义 卜辞 古文字学 甲金文 洪水 造字 周礼
- 描述：》学家发挥,沿袭了一千九百年左右,至今仍被古文字学者奉守。如康殷《文字源流浅说》云:“(?)甲释昔,可能是象在日光下晒制乾(腊)肉条之状。把一条条肉晒干是要几天时间的,因而殷人卜辞称几天之
- 释甲骨文腥胜二字
- 作者：刘昭瑞 来源：河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 甲骨文 辞意 《说文》 形声字 会意字 气变 小臣 卜辞 《通俗文》 《周礼
- 描述：解释”已卯卜毂贞:勿(?)妇好囗御囗”这条甲骨文时说:“字旧无识。此字鼻下有鱼,当即腥字, 《一切经音义》引《通俗文》曰‘鱼臭曰腥’”。说此字为鱼臭的会意字,这是很正确的。察《通俗文》“鱼臭曰腥”之腥当为腥字的后起义,本字应作(鱼生),《说文》鲤下说“鱼臭也,从鱼生声。”甲骨文
- 赞子固（诗五首）：为纪念曾巩逝世九百周年而作
- 作者：杨佐经 来源：抚州地方史志通讯 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述：赞子固（诗五首）：为纪念曾巩逝世九百周年而作
- 「学案」体裁产生的思想背景：从李绂的「陆子学谱」谈起
- 作者：黄进兴 来源：汉学研究 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述： historiography. In this essay, I will try to clarify how Huang's work departs from the older, more traditional styles used by historical analysts. Specifically, the Ming-ju will be examined from the vantage of precendent-in particular, the degree to which it follows the modes of presentation employed by the "intellectual geneaologies" (hsueh-pu or, yuan-yuan lu) and, the extent to which it departs from tradition by transforming content rather than form. For many, the rise of the school of Wang Yang-ming during the sixteenth century signalled not only a revival of the teachings of Lu Hsiang-shan but also rekindled the intense debates of almost forgotten issues previously argued by those who adhered to the school of Chu Hsi and those who held to the theories of Lu Hsiang-shan. From the middle-Ming period onward, however, the conflicts generated by these two schools of thought began to extend well beyond the realm of academic argument. As both Chan Chien and Ku Yen-wu noted, their bickering began to influence such extra-intellectual areas as how the civil-service examinations should be organized. As these conflicts continued to broaden and to deepen, both schools felt impelled to strengthen their philosophical positions and to purify the accounts of their intellectual origins. As such, the construction of an "intellectual geneaology" became a major device used either to undermine the "legitimacy" of the learning of the opposition or to explain how the contending school had, indeed, inherited the transmission of the true Way. Since this sort of approach encouraged a strong sense of faction-spirit, it was only a question of time until it would be deemed biased. And, it was precisely because of the unevenness in evaluating issues exhibited by these compilations that Huang Tsung-hsi felt compelled to compose the "Philosophical Records"--a work at once noteworthy for its ability to bring impartiality and objectivity to historical analysis. Yet, if the "Philosophical Records" is juxtaposed against the "geneaologies" the difference between these two works tends to pale when one realizes that the compositional style employed by both is, essentially, the same. Here, the "Philosophical Records" can hardly be viewed as presenting one with a radical departure from precedent. Rather, Huang's work derives its import from the refreshing non-partisan approach it brings to the analysis of historical issues. Instead of writing intellectual history with a view toward proving various predetermined value-judgments, the "Philosophical Records" uses exposition to explore the multifarious realms that inform "historical reality" in all its variety and fullness.