检索结果相关分组
- 按栏目分组
- 历史名人 (17)
- 按来源分组
- 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)(1)
- 江西教育学院学报(综合版)(1)
- 江西教育学院学报(1)
- 黑龙江教育(中学教学案例与研究)(1)
- 湖南师范大学教育科学学报(1)
-
- 《明儒学案·师说》“邓先生”考述
- 作者：朱光磊 来源：人文杂志 年份：2013 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 明儒学案 师说 邓先生 邓定宇 邓元锡
- 描述：宗羲裁篇拼凑刘宗周《皇明道统录》而成文气不顺之“师说”,也是引起后人误解的一大原因.
- 《明儒学案》以〈崇仁学案〉为卷首之意义之衡定：从吴与弼「心
- 作者：许惠敏 来源：当代儒学研究 年份：2007 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 吴与弼 理学 心学 持敬 读书
- 描述：黄宗羲将吴与弼置於《明儒学案》卷首之意义。
- 宋元时期理学的论争与《宋元学案》的理学观点
- 作者：卢钟锋 来源：文史哲 年份：1986 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 理学家 太极图说 气质之性 朱熹 陆九渊 黄宗羲 无极 全祖望 学史 分殊
- 描述：》编纂者的理学观点。根据《宋元学案》的综论,宋元时期理学的重大论争,大体有如下几个方面:
- “鸳鸯绣取凭君看，要把金针度与人”：“学案教学”的立足点应
- 作者：周宝广 来源：中学历史教学研究 年份：2012 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 学生主动参与 学法指导 学案教学 历史学习 学会学习 鸳鸯 金针 现代教学理论
- 描述：重要意义之一是学会学习，而学会学习的主要体现是掌握和运用学习方法。学生能够有意识地运用有效的学习方法，是学习持续发展的重要保证，也是衡量学习水平的重要尺度。而学生学会学习的显著特征是学生能够自己学习。那么学生怎样才能够实现自己学习呢？
- 《明儒学案・师说罗汝芳传》人物考辨
- 作者：赵文会 来源：宁波大学学报(人文科学版) 年份：2013 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 学术史 黄宗羲 明儒学案 宋明理学 考辨 罗汝芳
- 描述：有学者认为《明儒学案?师说罗汝芳传》中邓先生指邓以
- 「学案」体裁产生的思想背景：从李绂的「陆子学谱」谈起
- 作者：黄进兴 来源：汉学研究 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述： historiography. In this essay, I will try to clarify how Huang's work departs from the older, more traditional styles used by historical analysts. Specifically, the Ming-ju will be examined from the vantage of precendent-in particular, the degree to which it follows the modes of presentation employed by the "intellectual geneaologies" (hsueh-pu or, yuan-yuan lu) and, the extent to which it departs from tradition by transforming content rather than form. For many, the rise of the school of Wang Yang-ming during the sixteenth century signalled not only a revival of the teachings of Lu Hsiang-shan but also rekindled the intense debates of almost forgotten issues previously argued by those who adhered to the school of Chu Hsi and those who held to the theories of Lu Hsiang-shan. From the middle-Ming period onward, however, the conflicts generated by these two schools of thought began to extend well beyond the realm of academic argument. As both Chan Chien and Ku Yen-wu noted, their bickering began to influence such extra-intellectual areas as how the civil-service examinations should be organized. As these conflicts continued to broaden and to deepen, both schools felt impelled to strengthen their philosophical positions and to purify the accounts of their intellectual origins. As such, the construction of an "intellectual geneaology" became a major device used either to undermine the "legitimacy" of the learning of the opposition or to explain how the contending school had, indeed, inherited the transmission of the true Way. Since this sort of approach encouraged a strong sense of faction-spirit, it was only a question of time until it would be deemed biased. And, it was precisely because of the unevenness in evaluating issues exhibited by these compilations that Huang Tsung-hsi felt compelled to compose the "Philosophical Records"--a work at once noteworthy for its ability to bring impartiality and objectivity to historical analysis. Yet, if the "Philosophical Records" is juxtaposed against the "geneaologies" the difference between these two works tends to pale when one realizes that the compositional style employed by both is, essentially, the same. Here, the "Philosophical Records" can hardly be viewed as presenting one with a radical departure from precedent. Rather, Huang's work derives its import from the refreshing non-partisan approach it brings to the analysis of historical issues. Instead of writing intellectual history with a view toward proving various predetermined value-judgments, the "Philosophical Records" uses exposition to explore the multifarious realms that inform "historical reality" in all its variety and fullness.