检索结果相关分组
- 「学案」体裁产生的思想背景：从李绂的「陆子学谱」谈起
- 作者：黄进兴 来源：汉学研究 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述： historiography. In this essay, I will try to clarify how Huang's work departs from the older, more traditional styles used by historical analysts. Specifically, the Ming-ju will be examined from the vantage of precendent-in particular, the degree to which it follows the modes of presentation employed by the "intellectual geneaologies" (hsueh-pu or, yuan-yuan lu) and, the extent to which it departs from tradition by transforming content rather than form. For many, the rise of the school of Wang Yang-ming during the sixteenth century signalled not only a revival of the teachings of Lu Hsiang-shan but also rekindled the intense debates of almost forgotten issues previously argued by those who adhered to the school of Chu Hsi and those who held to the theories of Lu Hsiang-shan. From the middle-Ming period onward, however, the conflicts generated by these two schools of thought began to extend well beyond the realm of academic argument. As both Chan Chien and Ku Yen-wu noted, their bickering began to influence such extra-intellectual areas as how the civil-service examinations should be organized. As these conflicts continued to broaden and to deepen, both schools felt impelled to strengthen their philosophical positions and to purify the accounts of their intellectual origins. As such, the construction of an "intellectual geneaology" became a major device used either to undermine the "legitimacy" of the learning of the opposition or to explain how the contending school had, indeed, inherited the transmission of the true Way. Since this sort of approach encouraged a strong sense of faction-spirit, it was only a question of time until it would be deemed biased. And, it was precisely because of the unevenness in evaluating issues exhibited by these compilations that Huang Tsung-hsi felt compelled to compose the "Philosophical Records"--a work at once noteworthy for its ability to bring impartiality and objectivity to historical analysis. Yet, if the "Philosophical Records" is juxtaposed against the "geneaologies" the difference between these two works tends to pale when one realizes that the compositional style employed by both is, essentially, the same. Here, the "Philosophical Records" can hardly be viewed as presenting one with a radical departure from precedent. Rather, Huang's work derives its import from the refreshing non-partisan approach it brings to the analysis of historical issues. Instead of writing intellectual history with a view toward proving various predetermined value-judgments, the "Philosophical Records" uses exposition to explore the multifarious realms that inform "historical reality" in all its variety and fullness.
- 我国十一世纪变法家的宣言书-读王安石《上仁宗皇帝言事书》
- 作者：金秀珍 来源：松辽学刊(社会科学版) 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 王安石 宣言书 北宋王朝 地主阶级 法先王 谏议 刑狱 熙宁变法 “新政” 宋仁宗
- 描述：一 《上仁宗皇帝言事书》,又称《上仁宗皇帝万言书》,是王安石在嘉祐三年(公元一○五八年),任提点江东刑狱返京述职时,写给宋仁宗赵祯的上书。但
- 不以个人恩怨定是非——由苏轼撰写《王安石赠太傅敕》想到的
- 作者：李东文 来源：秘书之友 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 王安石 撰写 个人偏见 晋惠帝 是非 封建社会 假公济私 苏东坡 光明磊落 潘岳
- 描述：封建社会里,待人处事能不畏强权、光明磊落、公正直言者有之;而曲意逢迎、假公济私、诬陷害人者亦有之.晋惠帝时,贾后要害愍怀太子,指示潘岳代太子起草章奏,并逼太子喝醉酒
- 读赵宗诚《关于王安石的自然观》——载一九六四年二月二十八日
- 作者：吕振羽 来源：吉林大学社会科学学报 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 王安石 自然观 历史条件 光明日报 自由商人 容许解 司马光 中小地主 进步性 北宋时期
- 描述：时候,他们就被旧党推下台。这表明在当时那种历史条件下,改良主义也不能和被容许解决任何问题。
- 王安石的教训
- 作者：于其化 来源：读书杂志 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 王安石变法 领导班子 知人善任 失败 用人问题 吕惠卿 投机 纪事本末 原因 钻进
- 描述：王安石变法是以失败而告终的,新法最后全部废除,他本人晚年也退居金陵,心灰意懒,不再过问政事。这次改革失败有多种原因,但王安石不能知人善任,致使一些趋炎附势,投机钻营之徒,借拥护新政之名,钻进了变法
- 王安石研究论文索引（1927-1983）
- 作者：江毓雄编 来源：江西大学图书馆资料室 年份：1984 文献类型 ：图书
- 描述：王安石研究论文索引（1927-1983）
- 王安石变法中的先后缓急
- 作者：王岸茂 年份：1984 文献类型 ：会议论文
- 描述：实表现出具有治理国家的远见卓识和杰出才能。
- 论王安石变法中的几个问题
- 作者：任树民 来源：西藏民族学院学报 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 王安石变法 宋神宗 熙宁 免役法 罢相 几个问题 小地主 司马光 “三冗” 轻徭薄赋
- 描述：终宋神宗之世,北宋王朝所推行的新法,其主持者果真是王安石吗?王安石是否执行了一条发展生产的理财方针?王安石变法失败的原因是否真的仅出于以司马光首的大官僚集团的反对?本文不揣浅陋,提出质疑,略述管见
- 评述王安石变法
- 作者：胡拙 来源：知识杂志(课外学习) 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述：评述王安石变法