-
「学案」体裁产生的思想背景:从李绂的「陆子学谱」谈起
-
作者:黄进兴 来源:汉学研究 年份:1984 文献类型 :期刊文章
-
描述: historiography. In this essay, I will try to clarify how Huang's work departs from the older, more traditional styles used by historical analysts. Specifically, the Ming-ju will be examined from the vantage of precendent-in particular, the degree to which it follows the modes of presentation employed by the "intellectual geneaologies" (hsueh-pu or, yuan-yuan lu) and, the extent to which it departs from tradition by transforming content rather than form.
For many, the rise of the school of Wang Yang-ming during the sixteenth century signalled not only a revival of the teachings of Lu Hsiang-shan but also rekindled the intense debates of almost forgotten issues previously argued by those who adhered to the school of Chu Hsi and those who held to the theories of Lu Hsiang-shan. From the middle-Ming period onward, however, the conflicts generated by these two schools of thought began to extend well beyond the realm of academic argument. As both Chan Chien and Ku Yen-wu noted, their bickering began to influence such extra-intellectual areas as how the civil-service examinations should be organized. As these conflicts continued to broaden and to deepen, both schools felt impelled to strengthen their philosophical positions and to purify the accounts of their intellectual origins. As such, the construction of an "intellectual geneaology" became a major device used either to undermine the "legitimacy" of the learning of the opposition or to explain how the contending school had, indeed, inherited the transmission of the true Way.
Since this sort of approach encouraged a strong sense of faction-spirit, it was only a question of time until it would be deemed biased. And, it was precisely because of the unevenness in evaluating issues exhibited by these compilations that Huang Tsung-hsi felt compelled to compose the "Philosophical Records"--a work at once noteworthy for its ability to bring impartiality and objectivity to historical analysis. Yet, if the "Philosophical Records" is juxtaposed against the "geneaologies" the difference between these two works tends to pale when one realizes that the compositional style employed by both is, essentially, the same. Here, the "Philosophical Records" can hardly be viewed as presenting one with a radical departure from precedent. Rather, Huang's work derives its import from the refreshing non-partisan approach it brings to the analysis of historical issues. Instead of writing intellectual history with a view toward proving various predetermined value-judgments, the "Philosophical Records" uses exposition to explore the multifarious realms that inform "historical reality" in all its variety and fullness.
-
重新评估唐人小说《冯燕传》的思想价值:兼议司空图、曾布对《
-
作者:周承铭 来源:盐城师范学院学报(人文社会科学版) 年份:2014 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 《冯燕传》 道德与法律评判体系 历史信息 思想价值
-
描述:;三是为地位卑微的小人物立传,开辟了后世中国小说人物平民化的先声。
-
王安石传 经典图文版
-
作者:梁启超 年份:2014 文献类型 :图书 关键词: 王安石 1021 1086 传记
-
描述:作为千年不遇的杰出人士,生前却被世人责难,死后数代都不能洗刷骂名,在西方有英国之克伦威尔,在中国则有宋代王安石。千百年来,王安石被骂作集一切乱臣贼子之大成的元凶。其实,他是数千年中华文明史上少见
-
王安石变法与三农问题对策研究
-
作者:杨止兖 年份:2010 文献类型 :会议论文 关键词: 王安石 变法 三农问题 对策
-
描述:的相似性。王安石变法遭受的“家天下”封建政治、经济、文化、军事体制和传统思想、道德、习俗的重压,丝毫不亚于当今解决三农问题所面临的种种阻力。解决当今三农问题,务必深刻吸取王安石变法的经验教训,妥善
-
王安石与《维摩经》、《楞严经》关系研究
-
作者:陈丽婷 年份:2010 文献类型 :学位论文 关键词: 王安石 佛教 《维摩诘经》 《楞严经》
-
描述:主要有:一是《维摩诘经》“不二”思想对王安石出处如一的处世方式的影响;二是《维摩诘经》对王安石处世态度的影响,促其晚期独特诗风的形成,即“悲壮寓于闲澹”。后者对王安石的影响主要表现在:一、《楞严经》的心性
-
王安石评论人物散文研究
-
作者:冯建邺 年份:2010 文献类型 :学位论文 关键词: 王安石 评论人物散文 内容特色 写作特色
-
描述:王安石评论人物散文研究
-
佛禅与王安石诗歌研究
-
作者:宫波 年份:2012 文献类型 :学位论文 关键词: 王安石 佛禅 诗歌 研究
-
描述:思想,以及对诗歌与佛禅两种意境的互济互融。体现出其高超的创作形式和技巧,使他的诗歌具有独特魅力。其诗歌风格引领了宋代诗歌风貌。因此从佛禅的角度切入,来研究王安石诗歌创作是十分必要的。全文共分为六
-
王安石《诗经新义》研究
-
作者:廖育菁 年份:2014 文献类型 :学位论文 关键词: 王安石 诗经新义 宋代经学
-
描述:010年,海峽兩岸相關王安石研究的單篇論文有三千多篇,博、碩士論文有六十多篇。而真正以王安石經學著作為主要研究對象的博、碩士論文海峽兩岸計有六本,而且都聚集在近十年(2005年以來)。 王安石經學
-
《三经新义》与王安石新学的形成
-
作者:吴依凡 年份:2014 文献类型 :学位论文 关键词: 王安石 《三经新义》 王安石新学
-
描述:架構。《三經新義》雖仍沿之前王安石學術「性命」之學的討論,但因王安石此時以外王事業的新政為重,故對內聖的性命之學,重視度下降。《三經新義》所表現的「性」,應是趨向於無善無惡,如此才容易開出「禮樂教化
-
王安石的经学观与经学解释学
-
作者:李祥俊 来源:中国哲学史 年份:2002 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 王安石 经书 经学 经学解释学
-
描述:王朝。在处理经书解释中的心与理、古与今、理与事、言与意关系基础上,王安石提出了自己独具特色的经学解释学。