-
「学案」体裁产生的思想背景:从李绂的「陆子学谱」谈起
-
作者:黄进兴 来源:汉学研究 年份:1984 文献类型 :期刊文章
-
描述: historiography. In this essay, I will try to clarify how Huang's work departs from the older, more traditional styles used by historical analysts. Specifically, the Ming-ju will be examined from the vantage of precendent-in particular, the degree to which it follows the modes of presentation employed by the "intellectual geneaologies" (hsueh-pu or, yuan-yuan lu) and, the extent to which it departs from tradition by transforming content rather than form.
For many, the rise of the school of Wang Yang-ming during the sixteenth century signalled not only a revival of the teachings of Lu Hsiang-shan but also rekindled the intense debates of almost forgotten issues previously argued by those who adhered to the school of Chu Hsi and those who held to the theories of Lu Hsiang-shan. From the middle-Ming period onward, however, the conflicts generated by these two schools of thought began to extend well beyond the realm of academic argument. As both Chan Chien and Ku Yen-wu noted, their bickering began to influence such extra-intellectual areas as how the civil-service examinations should be organized. As these conflicts continued to broaden and to deepen, both schools felt impelled to strengthen their philosophical positions and to purify the accounts of their intellectual origins. As such, the construction of an "intellectual geneaology" became a major device used either to undermine the "legitimacy" of the learning of the opposition or to explain how the contending school had, indeed, inherited the transmission of the true Way.
Since this sort of approach encouraged a strong sense of faction-spirit, it was only a question of time until it would be deemed biased. And, it was precisely because of the unevenness in evaluating issues exhibited by these compilations that Huang Tsung-hsi felt compelled to compose the "Philosophical Records"--a work at once noteworthy for its ability to bring impartiality and objectivity to historical analysis. Yet, if the "Philosophical Records" is juxtaposed against the "geneaologies" the difference between these two works tends to pale when one realizes that the compositional style employed by both is, essentially, the same. Here, the "Philosophical Records" can hardly be viewed as presenting one with a radical departure from precedent. Rather, Huang's work derives its import from the refreshing non-partisan approach it brings to the analysis of historical issues. Instead of writing intellectual history with a view toward proving various predetermined value-judgments, the "Philosophical Records" uses exposition to explore the multifarious realms that inform "historical reality" in all its variety and fullness.
-
历史复习教学中以学定教的实践与思考--以“王安石变法”一课
-
作者:钟汉尧 来源:福建基础教育研究 年份:2014 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 有效性 以学定教 教学相长
-
描述:提高历史复习的有效性,改变单一被动和陈旧的复习方式,以学定教,使学生真正成为教学活动的参与者,师生只有共同构建一种平等、和谐、民主、互动的新型教学关系,才能使历史高考复习实践活动产生应有的效果。
-
清人潘克溥的《诗经说铃》:一部淹没在《诗经》学海洋中的“诗
-
作者:张鹏飞 来源:诗经研究丛刊 年份:2011 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 诗经研究 诗义 诗序 孔子 文王 清人 诗三百 王应麟 择善而从 诗教
-
描述:世;采诗后别之以"周"、"召"是孔子时代编诗者别以邦域也(文王
-
汤显祖的戏曲理论管见--读叶长海教授《中国戏剧学史稿》心得
-
作者:姜赫 来源:剧作家 年份:2014 文献类型 :期刊文章
-
描述:陈腐观念格格不入的各种各派思想,他似乎都愿意汲取,多种观念交织融合在一起,形成一个‘雄浑博大、坚洁深秀’的理论结构”[1],汤显祖的理论思想反映着当时儒家道统被冲击,新精神尚未完成的时代特色,由此,叶
-
临济、曹洞二宗禅学比较研究
-
作者:殷玉楼 年份:2006 文献类型 :学位论文 关键词: 临济宗 曹洞宗 禅 道
-
描述:禅学思想又不尽相同,禅法差异较大,禅风也形成鲜明对照。 本文以比较的方法研究了两家的禅学,分析两家立宗法门与弘法施设,以期品味其迥异之趣。概括而言,临济宗要求学人必须首先建立“真正见解
-
为霖道霈禅师禅学研究
-
作者:马海燕 年份:2011 文献类型 :学位论文 关键词: 明末清初 山林佛教 禅宗 曹洞宗 为霖道霈
-
描述:。这七个部分具体内容如下:绪论:主要介绍学界目前关于禅学研究特别是明清禅研究、鼓山禅(永觉元贤等)研究以及为霖道霈禅师研究的概况,通过比照性的回顾来确定本论文研究的出发点以及研究的目标,积极汲取前人
-
《金山寺梦游录》的语言特征研究
-
作者:朴辰夏 年份:2011 文献类型 :学位论文 关键词: 金山寺梦游录 语音标记 词汇特征 语法特征
-
描述:、因为在形态特征上由于元音和谐被进一步打破,所以在词尾使用上没有考虑阴性阳性词汇相搭配的规则,因此,在资料中不难看出任意性特点。以上研究成果为研究文学和朝鲜语语言体系有一定的参考价值。
-
日本驹泽大学与佛教研究
-
作者:杨曾文 来源:世界宗教文化 年份:1998 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 日本曹洞宗 中国佛教 禅宗史 三教关系 禅宗文献 华严宗 摩诃止观 坛经 文学博士 菩提达摩
-
描述:川时期(1603-1867)日本佛教各宗兴起研究和办...
-
关于江西曹洞宗保护的研究
-
作者:陈武阳 戴富华 王维燕 来源:文史月刊(学术) 年份:2012 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 江西 江西 曹洞宗 曹洞宗 保护 保护
-
描述:文化研究,二要加强曹洞宗遗址修缮,三要发展曹洞宗文化旅游。
-
曹洞宗禅诗研究
-
作者:吴言生 来源:陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) 年份:1999 文献类型 :期刊文章 关键词: 曹洞宗 禅诗 正偏 回互理论
-
描述:在禅宗五家中,曹洞宗宗风绵密,其禅诗向来被视为晦涩难解、如天书哑谜。从其哲学的核心正偏回互理论入手,对曹洞宗禅诗文本解码,可发现曹洞宗禅诗由以体用为主的两大意象序列组成,形成了一个绵整严密的象喻体系。曹洞宗由此两组意象序列的回互,启迪参禅者进入禅悟体验,由此形成了曹洞宗禅诗独特的美感特质