检索结果相关分组
- 「学案」体裁产生的思想背景：从李绂的「陆子学谱」谈起
- 作者：黄进兴 来源：汉学研究 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述： historiography. In this essay, I will try to clarify how Huang's work departs from the older, more traditional styles used by historical analysts. Specifically, the Ming-ju will be examined from the vantage of precendent-in particular, the degree to which it follows the modes of presentation employed by the "intellectual geneaologies" (hsueh-pu or, yuan-yuan lu) and, the extent to which it departs from tradition by transforming content rather than form. For many, the rise of the school of Wang Yang-ming during the sixteenth century signalled not only a revival of the teachings of Lu Hsiang-shan but also rekindled the intense debates of almost forgotten issues previously argued by those who adhered to the school of Chu Hsi and those who held to the theories of Lu Hsiang-shan. From the middle-Ming period onward, however, the conflicts generated by these two schools of thought began to extend well beyond the realm of academic argument. As both Chan Chien and Ku Yen-wu noted, their bickering began to influence such extra-intellectual areas as how the civil-service examinations should be organized. As these conflicts continued to broaden and to deepen, both schools felt impelled to strengthen their philosophical positions and to purify the accounts of their intellectual origins. As such, the construction of an "intellectual geneaology" became a major device used either to undermine the "legitimacy" of the learning of the opposition or to explain how the contending school had, indeed, inherited the transmission of the true Way. Since this sort of approach encouraged a strong sense of faction-spirit, it was only a question of time until it would be deemed biased. And, it was precisely because of the unevenness in evaluating issues exhibited by these compilations that Huang Tsung-hsi felt compelled to compose the "Philosophical Records"--a work at once noteworthy for its ability to bring impartiality and objectivity to historical analysis. Yet, if the "Philosophical Records" is juxtaposed against the "geneaologies" the difference between these two works tends to pale when one realizes that the compositional style employed by both is, essentially, the same. Here, the "Philosophical Records" can hardly be viewed as presenting one with a radical departure from precedent. Rather, Huang's work derives its import from the refreshing non-partisan approach it brings to the analysis of historical issues. Instead of writing intellectual history with a view toward proving various predetermined value-judgments, the "Philosophical Records" uses exposition to explore the multifarious realms that inform "historical reality" in all its variety and fullness.
- 此陆非彼陆
- 作者：陈军 来源：中学历史教学 年份：2010 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 宋明理学 《历史》 陆九渊 人教版 发明人 教材
- 描述：人教版《历史》必修Ⅲ第三课《宋明理学》《资料回放》说：“鹩湖之会，论及教人，元晦之意，欲令人泛观博览而后归之约．二陆之意欲先发明人之本心．而后使之博览。朱以陆之教人为太简，陆以来之教人为支离
- 宁有异学,不可有假学
- 作者：暂无 来源：文艺理论研究 年份：1994 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 中国思想史 传统文化 道学 性与天道 鹅湖之会 陆九渊 周敦颐 外来文化 新的发展阶段 光明日报
- 描述：如乌眼鸡,恨不得一口啄死对方,而是反复辩论,各抒己见.“鹅湖之会”成为中国思想史上的佳话.“旧学商量加邃密,新知培养转深沉”,气象恢宏,心窗八面来风.
- 朱陆哲学比较研究
- 作者：彭永捷 年份：1997 文献类型 ：学位论文 关键词： 朱熹 陆九渊 朱陆之辩 道德 伦理
- 描述：博士学位论文摘要 绪论 宋明理学的一条主线 朱熹和陆象山都是南宋时代的大儒，他们分别是理学中道学与心学的重要代表人物。而道学和心学又成为宋代理学以及整个元、明、清哲学中最主要和最有影响的哲学学
- 陆象山的心学与实学
- 作者：刘晓梅 年份：2006 文献类型 ：学位论文 关键词： 陆九渊 心学 实学 哲学思想
- 描述：陆九渊因为在哲学上提出了“心即理”的命题，断言“宇宙便是吾心，吾心便是宇宙”，认为天理、人理、物理只在吾心之中，人同此心，心同此理，把心和理、心和伦理纲常等同起来，使脱离于主体的客观之“理”消融在主体之“心”中，强调“心”的统帅作用，“心”成为其哲学体系的最高... >> 详细
- 陆氏心学辨
- 作者：王德有 来源：孔子研究 年份：1988 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 陆九渊 主观唯心主义 宇宙 客观唯心主义 思想体系 本体论 心学 普遍法则 认识论 哲学体系
- 描述：学,已有几百年的历史,然以主观唯心主义冠陆氏的哲学体系,则不可以不辨。分析其整个思想体系,可以得出这样的判断:陆九渊的哲学在本体论上是客观唯心主义,在认识论上具有主观唯心主义因素。
- 陆王“心学”的道德修养论
- 作者：陈平 来源：道德与文明 年份：1988 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 道德修养论 心学 理想人格 封建道德 王阳明 陆九渊 系统化 陆象山 规范约束 道德现象
- 描述：接的知识和手段,也不能单纯依凭政治军事措施,只从表面上清除“恶”,而是要使人们都真正从内心里树立起封建道德的权威,都自觉地以封建道德规范约束自己,才能从根本上解决问题。