检索结果相关分组
- 「学案」体裁产生的思想背景：从李绂的「陆子学谱」谈起
- 作者：黄进兴 来源：汉学研究 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述： historiography. In this essay, I will try to clarify how Huang's work departs from the older, more traditional styles used by historical analysts. Specifically, the Ming-ju will be examined from the vantage of precendent-in particular, the degree to which it follows the modes of presentation employed by the "intellectual geneaologies" (hsueh-pu or, yuan-yuan lu) and, the extent to which it departs from tradition by transforming content rather than form. For many, the rise of the school of Wang Yang-ming during the sixteenth century signalled not only a revival of the teachings of Lu Hsiang-shan but also rekindled the intense debates of almost forgotten issues previously argued by those who adhered to the school of Chu Hsi and those who held to the theories of Lu Hsiang-shan. From the middle-Ming period onward, however, the conflicts generated by these two schools of thought began to extend well beyond the realm of academic argument. As both Chan Chien and Ku Yen-wu noted, their bickering began to influence such extra-intellectual areas as how the civil-service examinations should be organized. As these conflicts continued to broaden and to deepen, both schools felt impelled to strengthen their philosophical positions and to purify the accounts of their intellectual origins. As such, the construction of an "intellectual geneaology" became a major device used either to undermine the "legitimacy" of the learning of the opposition or to explain how the contending school had, indeed, inherited the transmission of the true Way. Since this sort of approach encouraged a strong sense of faction-spirit, it was only a question of time until it would be deemed biased. And, it was precisely because of the unevenness in evaluating issues exhibited by these compilations that Huang Tsung-hsi felt compelled to compose the "Philosophical Records"--a work at once noteworthy for its ability to bring impartiality and objectivity to historical analysis. Yet, if the "Philosophical Records" is juxtaposed against the "geneaologies" the difference between these two works tends to pale when one realizes that the compositional style employed by both is, essentially, the same. Here, the "Philosophical Records" can hardly be viewed as presenting one with a radical departure from precedent. Rather, Huang's work derives its import from the refreshing non-partisan approach it brings to the analysis of historical issues. Instead of writing intellectual history with a view toward proving various predetermined value-judgments, the "Philosophical Records" uses exposition to explore the multifarious realms that inform "historical reality" in all its variety and fullness.
- 再说《牡丹亭》
- 作者：何寅 来源：山西师大学报(社会科学版) 年份：1994 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 《牡丹亭》 杜丽娘 封建婚姻制度 汤显祖 封建礼教 《牡丹亭题词》 《西厢记》 柳梦梅 石道姑 程朱理学
- 描述：过去，人们大多以“反对封建婚姻制度”来归纳、评价《牡丹亭》的思想意义和杜丽娘这一形象的价值取向，本文认为，《牡丹亭》的戏剧冲突并不是建构在杜丽娘、柳梦梅与封建婚姻制度的矛盾上的．《牡丹亭》着意写
- 汤显祖与唐代文学
- 作者：赵山林 来源：文史哲 年份：1998 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 汤显祖 汤显祖 唐代文学 唐代文学 牡丹亭 牡丹亭
- 描述：唐七言律绝重视语言的工致婉丽。汤显祖对唐代文学极为熟悉和喜爱，他写作《牡丹亭》时有意在以上四个方面继承借鉴唐代文学，从中汲取了丰富的营养。
- 解读汤显祖的“至情观”
- 作者：易新香 来源：牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版) 年份：2012 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 汤显祖 汤显祖 至情观 至情观 牡丹亭 牡丹亭
- 描述："情"是汤显祖文学思想的核心,而"至情"是其追求的有情人生的最高境界,也是贯穿于汤显祖整个艺术世界的灵魂。《牡丹亭》是汤显祖"至情观"的最好演绎,其贯通于生死虚实之间的"至情"呼唤着精神的自由和个性
- 《大学语文·惊梦》注商四则
- 作者：吴琼 来源：学语文 年份：2008 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 大学语文 牡丹亭 汤显祖
- 描述：外研社《新编大学语文》教材所选汤显祖《牡丹亭·惊梦》一出,有几则注释值得商榷。一、沉烟课文选自徐朔方、杨笑梅校注的《牡丹亭》﹙人民文学出版社1963年版﹚,教材对沉烟的注释就沿用了该书,释为:沉香
- “玉茗堂四梦”各剧题词的写作时间考
- 作者：黄仕忠 来源：文学遗产 年份：2011 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 汤显祖 牡丹亭 唐振吾 臧晋叔
- 描述：贬官广东时的所见所闻,断不可能成于万历戊子,故应以署作万历戊戌即万历二十六年(1598)者为是。因知臧本所署,出自臧氏个人推断;汤氏各剧的完成时间,需要重新考虑。