检索结果相关分组
- 批判陆王学派的豪昧主义
- 作者：张锡勤 来源：求是学刊 年份：1980 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 陆王心学 陆王学派 王守仁 圣人 尊德性 陆九渊 无知无欲 道问学 “致良知” 信仰主义
- 描述：批判陆王学派的豪昧主义
- 看天吃饭不应是现代农业的主题词:有话就说
- 作者：晏 子 来源：京郊日报 年份：2014 文献类型 ：报纸
- 描述：看天吃饭不应是现代农业的主题词:有话就说
- 李绂与《陆子学谱》
- 作者：杨朝亮 年份：2003 文献类型 ：学位论文
- 描述：地留给了陆王后学。 在清代陆王学术的发展中，李绂是其关键人物之一。李绂一生致力于陆王学术，著有《陆子学谱》、《陆子年谱》、《朱子晚年全论》诸书，极力为陆学争正统。《陆子学谱》二十卷，用李绂
- 读《李绂与〈陆子学谱〉》
- 作者：李尚英 来源：中国社会科学院研究生院学报 年份：2006 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 朱子学 李绂 中国封建社会 历史时期 康乾盛世 理性思维 心学思想 继续发展 内在逻辑 统治者
- 描述：清代是中国封建社会中一个重要的历史时期,它不仅呈现出康乾盛世的繁荣,而且也在学术上做出了重要贡献。清初,统治者把朱子学确立为官方哲学,致使清前期陆王心学思想中理性思维的光辉逐渐黯淡无光。但陆王学术
- 论学派
- 作者：倪波 纪红 来源：南京社会科学 年份：1995 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 研究方法 乾嘉学派 王阳明 学术观点 学科发展 科学家共同体 研究对象 陆九渊 艺术风格 师承关系
- 描述：论学派倪波，纪红在科学发展的历史长河中，各家学派林林总总，点辍着学术星河，在真理的探求过程中起着不可估量的作用。本文试就学派的涵义、作用、特点、成因等几个方面作某些探讨。一、学派的涵义学苑文坛所呈现
- 杨朝亮著《李绂与〈陆子学谱〉》评介
- 作者：袁林 来源：中国史研究动态 年份：2006 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 评介 子学 李绂 学术特征 今文经学 内在张力 章太炎 梁启超 学术史
- 描述：陆王学的研究，就是一个亟需充实的薄弱环节。
- 「学案」体裁产生的思想背景：从李绂的「陆子学谱」谈起
- 作者：黄进兴 来源：汉学研究 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述： historiography. In this essay, I will try to clarify how Huang's work departs from the older, more traditional styles used by historical analysts. Specifically, the Ming-ju will be examined from the vantage of precendent-in particular, the degree to which it follows the modes of presentation employed by the "intellectual geneaologies" (hsueh-pu or, yuan-yuan lu) and, the extent to which it departs from tradition by transforming content rather than form. For many, the rise of the school of Wang Yang-ming during the sixteenth century signalled not only a revival of the teachings of Lu Hsiang-shan but also rekindled the intense debates of almost forgotten issues previously argued by those who adhered to the school of Chu Hsi and those who held to the theories of Lu Hsiang-shan. From the middle-Ming period onward, however, the conflicts generated by these two schools of thought began to extend well beyond the realm of academic argument. As both Chan Chien and Ku Yen-wu noted, their bickering began to influence such extra-intellectual areas as how the civil-service examinations should be organized. As these conflicts continued to broaden and to deepen, both schools felt impelled to strengthen their philosophical positions and to purify the accounts of their intellectual origins. As such, the construction of an "intellectual geneaology" became a major device used either to undermine the "legitimacy" of the learning of the opposition or to explain how the contending school had, indeed, inherited the transmission of the true Way. Since this sort of approach encouraged a strong sense of faction-spirit, it was only a question of time until it would be deemed biased. And, it was precisely because of the unevenness in evaluating issues exhibited by these compilations that Huang Tsung-hsi felt compelled to compose the "Philosophical Records"--a work at once noteworthy for its ability to bring impartiality and objectivity to historical analysis. Yet, if the "Philosophical Records" is juxtaposed against the "geneaologies" the difference between these two works tends to pale when one realizes that the compositional style employed by both is, essentially, the same. Here, the "Philosophical Records" can hardly be viewed as presenting one with a radical departure from precedent. Rather, Huang's work derives its import from the refreshing non-partisan approach it brings to the analysis of historical issues. Instead of writing intellectual history with a view toward proving various predetermined value-judgments, the "Philosophical Records" uses exposition to explore the multifarious realms that inform "historical reality" in all its variety and fullness.
- 论陆九渊学派
- 作者：王煜 来源：伦理学研究(台湾及海外中文报刊资料专辑) 年份：1987 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述：论陆九渊学派