检索结果相关分组
- 论李绂的生平与学术
- 作者：杨朝亮 来源：东岳论丛 年份：2003 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 李绂 三起三黜 陆子学谱 朱子晚年全论
- 描述：李绂是清代康雍乾时期的儒臣,任官内外,曾担任民政、漕运、典试、祭告、志书馆等职。在政治上,廉洁奉公,关心边疆,注重教育,爱惜人才,由于耿介直言,秉公执法,不随波逐流,而使得其一生三起三黜。在学术上
- 李绂藻轶事
- 作者：谭业明 戚运炳 来源：湖北文史资料 年份：1997 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 光绪帝 李绂 帝国主义列强 平等条约 扶清灭洋 翰林院 帝国主义侵略 实现诺言 义和团 说也奇怪
- 描述：李绂藻轶事
- 李绂方志理论研究
- 作者：褚赣生 来源：江西社会科学 年份：1986 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 修志 方志理论 李绂 中国方志 初稿 章学诚 通志 方志编纂 临川 史志
- 描述：验分不开。事实上,在章学诚之前很久(至少可以溯源到东晋)就有人探
- 李绂交游简论
- 作者：陈小辉 许敏妮 来源：哈尔滨学院学报 年份：2006 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 李绂 游十洲 陈彦瑜 李光地 方苞 全祖望 交游
- 描述：清代的理学家、方志学家李绂交游颇广,爱才如命,其交游情况直接反映了他的政治学术生平。然而,后人仅从他作为阳明学派传承人的角度对其进行研究,很少有专门的论述。文章从文学角度入手,通过对李绂交游情况
- 李绂年谱
- 作者：陈小辉 来源：东华理工学院学报(社会科学版) 年份：2007 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 李绂 年谱 理学家
- 描述：术方面。因此有必要重新修正年谱,本谱在此基础上详加考证,补充了不少内容,相信对研究李绂不无借鉴作用。
- 论李绂的道统史观
- 作者：伍贤达 来源：河北经贸大学学报(综合版) 年份：2008 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： 李绂 李绂 道统 道统 心学 心学
- 描述：李绂是清代心学的重要人物,他主要通过编纂学术史的方式,以《陆子学谱》、《朱子晚年全论》来奠定他的道统史观。同时,他还在一些散论中对其道统论进行了重要补充,建立了一个上起唐虞,下至王阳明的甚至包括程朱
- 李绂的“唯才是举”
- 作者：刘诚龙 来源：前线 年份：2013 文献类型 ：期刊文章 关键词： “唯才是举” 李绂 人才 诗社
- 描述：清代康熙年问，发生过一起规模J,J,JJ,的人才问的冲突。事情缘起并非命官钳制人才，亦非朝廷压迫人才，而起自李绂主持的一次会试。李绂堪称大才。“十岁能诗，十二岁，即与里中诸先生结诗社。”“读书
- 「学案」体裁产生的思想背景：从李绂的「陆子学谱」谈起
- 作者：黄进兴 来源：汉学研究 年份：1984 文献类型 ：期刊文章
- 描述： historiography. In this essay, I will try to clarify how Huang's work departs from the older, more traditional styles used by historical analysts. Specifically, the Ming-ju will be examined from the vantage of precendent-in particular, the degree to which it follows the modes of presentation employed by the "intellectual geneaologies" (hsueh-pu or, yuan-yuan lu) and, the extent to which it departs from tradition by transforming content rather than form. For many, the rise of the school of Wang Yang-ming during the sixteenth century signalled not only a revival of the teachings of Lu Hsiang-shan but also rekindled the intense debates of almost forgotten issues previously argued by those who adhered to the school of Chu Hsi and those who held to the theories of Lu Hsiang-shan. From the middle-Ming period onward, however, the conflicts generated by these two schools of thought began to extend well beyond the realm of academic argument. As both Chan Chien and Ku Yen-wu noted, their bickering began to influence such extra-intellectual areas as how the civil-service examinations should be organized. As these conflicts continued to broaden and to deepen, both schools felt impelled to strengthen their philosophical positions and to purify the accounts of their intellectual origins. As such, the construction of an "intellectual geneaology" became a major device used either to undermine the "legitimacy" of the learning of the opposition or to explain how the contending school had, indeed, inherited the transmission of the true Way. Since this sort of approach encouraged a strong sense of faction-spirit, it was only a question of time until it would be deemed biased. And, it was precisely because of the unevenness in evaluating issues exhibited by these compilations that Huang Tsung-hsi felt compelled to compose the "Philosophical Records"--a work at once noteworthy for its ability to bring impartiality and objectivity to historical analysis. Yet, if the "Philosophical Records" is juxtaposed against the "geneaologies" the difference between these two works tends to pale when one realizes that the compositional style employed by both is, essentially, the same. Here, the "Philosophical Records" can hardly be viewed as presenting one with a radical departure from precedent. Rather, Huang's work derives its import from the refreshing non-partisan approach it brings to the analysis of historical issues. Instead of writing intellectual history with a view toward proving various predetermined value-judgments, the "Philosophical Records" uses exposition to explore the multifarious realms that inform "historical reality" in all its variety and fullness.